The U.S. Army’s Suicidal Death Spiral

June 9th, 2009

ssds.jpgPull up a chair, boys and girls, for I am about to educate you on a serious matter, one which the U.S. Army doesn’t seem to want solved; suicide. But Eric, how can you say that without feeling bad… the Army doesn’t want their soldiers dieing… do they?

When writing on a subject such as this, I must be both factual and straight forward; without remorse or restraint. What may seem like bias is really anger manifested towards the microcosm-like structure of the Army. I will present the facts, and you will make up your mind.

Lets start with some statistics (because that is what we are, aren’t we?)… In 2008, there were 133 suicides in the Army. So far (as of June 1, 2009) this year, there have been 64 confirmed suicides.

What could contribute to these numbers? 2008 hit a record high in suicide rates, what could possibly cause this to happen?

1.) Circumnavigation of deployment dwell time: After returning from a deployment, a soldier receives what is called dwell time. This is a made up number (typically a year) that states that you should not be deployed until your dwell time is up. The Army likes to get around this by issuing a redeploying soldier a PCS (permanent change of station) order to a unit that is near to deploying. Though a soldier can bring the issue of dwell time up with their next unit, it is often ignored and the soldier deploys before their dwell time is up.

2.) Extended deployment lengths: Though the Army did away with 15-month deployments, we are still seeing an influx of units that were deployed under this order returning from theaters of battle. My unit just got back in February, and we have already seen suicides here, as well as a number of other offenses (DUIs, domestic violence, etc) that were significantly lower in comparison to units that only deployed for a year. There is a limit on how long a unit can deploy until the fabric starts to tear.

3.) Command influence: This is a big one. You have two types of commanders in the Army; Check-The-Box commanders who only care that they provide the minimal amount of assistance to soldiers, and commanders who actually care and will go above and beyond to help those with issues.

“If any one of you mark anything down in there, there’s going to be hell to pay.” This is an actual quote from a commander briefing his guys before a psychological exam during a post-deployment health assessment. Think this person is only one in a hundred? Think again. I’ve personally heard numerous officers and NCOs utter the same language.

Additionally, this creates fear in the ranks. Various soldiers in the Army do have serious psychological problems (as we are seeing); some need help. Leaders should be encouraging soldiers to seek mental help when needed, unfortunately, that’s not the case. Seeing a psychologist or psychiatrist is often frowned upon, and unofficially (as this is not the person I am, and I do actually care for those I lead), can cast a shadow over your career.

When dealing with these types of medical conditions, a mentally unstable person is the last in order you want to be with when putting your life on the line.

For leaders, discouraging against mental health appointments for those who request/need it is not only unethical and immoral, but also a dereliction of duty. There needs to be harsh punishments for these types of leaders. Unfortunately, corruption in this regard can often go all the way up to the policymakers.

4.) Mass distribution and mass punishment: I’d like to see the cheat sheets referencing the course of action for suicides in Army units (who knows, maybe one day I will submit a Freedom of Information Act request). The one common thing they would include would be mass distribution of prevention classes (an entourage from Army Substance Abuse Program, Army Community Service and a myriad of the other acronyms) delivered in high definition, color-corrected PowerPoint slides. What does that mean? They will try to scare you into what will happen if you commit, or attempt to commit suicide (or drive drunk, etc). This typically includes pictures of severely burnt people, videos of tragic crashes, photos of maimed and dismembered individuals or of kids coming home to their dad hanging from a belt.

I don’t understand what they think is going to be accomplished by showing these to people… if anything, it only makes them more depressed. And for those not in that mindset, it will give them ideas.

“Don’t kill yourself.” That’s all you have to say.

How do they expect people to take it? “Don’t kill yourself, because if you do, you will end up dead.” ……. “Oh well I never thought of it like that, no more suicide for me!”

For those who don’t fall into the suicidal category, each of these prevention classes represent punishment on a massive scale. And if you are the type of person who thinks that mass punishment in the Army is the answer to problems, take your GED and get the hell off my website.

Mass punishment is a primer for dissent and disarray. It does not work, and it serves no purpose but to allow the person in charge to “feel the power” over their subordinates. From this, the stage is set and we start to make our gradual decent into what I like to call…

The Death Spiral

tornado-thumb3491976.jpg

death·spi·ral, noun, the gradual deterioration of a person’s morale by a vast array of influence eventually causing an unhealthy mindset or demise.

This is how it happens…

It all starts out when PVT Johnny decides to join the Army. Knowing that basic training would be tough both physically and mentally, he sticks through it and takes the heat hurled at him in stride.

He completes training and receives orders for his first duty station, which happens to be at the 25th Infantry Division in Hawaii. Awesome, he says. Hawaii will be a great place to be stationed!

Oh was PVT Johnny wrong. He starts to learn this when he arrives at his new company, which is hellbent on making his life even more of a hell than at basic training. He is hazed, humiliated, physically abused and has never felt this bad before in his whole life.

As he works his way through the days at the 25th, PVT Johnny starts to become a more familiar face and the hazing eventually dies down. And then it happens. His commander announces that they will be deploying to Iraq within three months for a duration of 15 months. Not completely sure about what to think, PVT Johnny goes with the flow and gets his affairs in order.

He arrives in Iraq and within the first two months, there are already four deaths in the company. Finally realizing the threat of the enemy, he elevates his vigilance level and is constantly on alert. A few months go by and one night, while on guard duty, PVT Johnny sees someone approaching his tower from outside his base. Stop, he shouts in Arabic… But there was no response. As trained, he escalates force and fires a warning shot next to the individual. The individual flees and is never heard from again. But what is PVT Johnny left with? A fired weapon that has no evidence that there was actually a threat to begin with.

He pleas with the person in charge of base defense, but is rejected. “Why would anyone try to approach a U.S. military compound alone like that?” The leader says. “This incident is considered a negligent discharge and it has to be reported to higher command.”

Escalation of force classes are ordered for the whole unit after the incident, and PVT Johnny is now scared to fire his weapon as it could be the most potentially damaging thing to his career.

A few weeks later, on a routine mounted patrol, a civilian vehicle approaches the rear of his convoy. Utilizing escalation of force, he attempts to wave the vehicle away. It does not stop or turn. Thinking that the vehicle might just not see him, he thinks nothing of it. Unfortunately, the vehicle manages to make its way in between the convoy and explodes at the side of a friendly HMMWV. The blast injures three people, and kills one.

Completely distraught, PVT Johnny can’t help but feel responsible for the death of his fellow soldier. He receives lectures from his chain of command on what he did wrong and how he could have prevented this incident from happening, all contradictory to the escalation of force class he previously received.

The deployment ensues and PVT Johnny remains depressed. Upon arrival back home in Hawaii, hes greeted with long days of post-deployment classes and surveys. In an unstable mental status, he knows he needs help. He’s been instructed by his leadership that for everything to go smoothly, do not mark anything down regarding depression. He follows their advice and is eventually cleared from his health assessment.

Trying to pick up where he left off, he goes out to bars with his team members and drinks at home alone. A week later, someone from PVT Johnny’s company receives a DUI. They blew a BAC of .06 which is within legal limits of civilian jurisdiction, but not according to the Army. In effort to prevent other service members from receiving DUIs, the company is forced to work on Saturdays for a month attending mandatory alcohol awareness briefings, adding to PVT Johnny’s deteriorating mental state.

Another week passes and PVT Johnny hears from another person that someone from their unit killed himself. Apparently, the individual shot himself right in front of his roommate. The blood and brain matter went all over his roommate and the walls. When the MPs arrived, they were so unprepared that they even asked the person to borrow trash bags and other personally owned materials to collect crime scene evidence.

In response to this incident, the commander decides to cancel all extended weekend passes for a month and orders the unit to attend suicide awareness classes. Here, they are shown explicit photographs and told unpleasant stories of individuals who thought suicide was the answer.

It is at this point that PVT Johnny becomes even more of an alcoholic. He is unable to deal with the pain as an individual, and with the fear of his team members alienating him for seeing mental health, he does not seek a psychologist. He starts to show up late, acts disrespectful and looses all motivation.

He becomes focused on the incident that happened over in Iraq, and it tears him apart inside. He ponders his existence and realizes what must be done to end his suffering.

PVT Johnny makes his choice, consumed by the death spiral.

It is not hard to realize why many people resort to suicide in the Army. It is a society bent on power, and those who wield it do not want to let go of it. They will do what they have to, or ignore what they have to, to make themselves a shining star. This is typically done through the belittling of others.

It is up to the leaders to change the way this event will play out. But if you continue the methods and practices you are currently applying, don’t expect it to end any time soon.

The Army needs to stop looking at soldiers as statistics, and start looking at them as individuals. Each person has someone directly above them. It is their job to ensure the well being of a soldier. Mass briefings and classes will only hamper any prospect of success towards a less-suicidal Army.

Commanders can take away the tools, but the motive will remain. They should focus their efforts on taking away the motive, on an individual basis, for anything else would be a poor attempt at resolution.

share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

2010, Obama And The Death Tax

May 26th, 2009

I wrote an article on RedState back in January of this year outlining statistics and my opinion on the death tax, and what to expect with the temporary repeal in 2010.

Apparently, buried deep in the Presidential budget on page 127, released earlier this year, reads “The estate tax is maintained at its 2009 parameters.” So much for 2010 being a good year to die.

My only speculation on why this would be added to the budget would be to ensure that the estate tax is a constant shadow on our society. It has been an expectation by economists that once the estate tax is repealed (temporary or permanently), it would be gone for good.

This being said, the administration’s promise for no tax increases in 2009 or 2010 has already been broken. Don’t you love it when government officials are caught in a lie?

deathtax.png

—– RedState Article (dated January 17, 2009)

Unknown to many Americans is the taxation of their assets after death. The estate tax, also dubbed the “death tax” or “inheritance tax,” is a federally imposed levy on an individual’s possessions (liquidity, property, etc) at the time of their demise. Additionally, various states impose a “pick-up” tax on an estate, pursuant with Internal Revenue Code Section 2011, which allows them to tack on extra tax yielding in state revenue.

In 2001, congress passed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act, which repealed the estate tax for the year 2010. In addition to this repeal, it emplaced various conditions on the estate tax which would raise the exclusion amount (amount of non-taxable assets) and gradually lower the top tax rate until 2010.

YEAR   EXCLUSION   TOP RATE
2001     $675,000        55%
2002     $1 million        50%
2003     $1 million        49%
2004     $1.5 million     48%
2005     $1.5 million     47%
2006     $2 million        46%
2007     $2 million        45%
2008     $2 million        45%
2009     $3.5 million     45%
2010     $0                   0%
2011     $1 million        55%

In 2011, the repeal will be rescinded and the exclusion/top tax rate will reset to near-2001 levels, with a 55% top tax imposed on assets over $1,000,000.

The estate tax works by deducting the current exclusion value from the gross value of an estate. The excess amount is then taxed at the current, tentative rate. For example, an individual, assuming no deductions, who dies in 2011 with an estate valued at $2 million, would pay $435,000 in tax.

There are various deductions (charitable contributions, debt, etc) that would allow an individual to pay less estate tax; furthermore, there are economic mechanisms such as inflation, which silently increase the unadjusted exclusion amount since inception. This means that individuals with an estate of, for example, $1,000,000 in 2001, would have an inflation-adjusted worth of $1,199,464 in 2008. When the estate tax is repealed in 2011, an individual in this situation would be thrown into the eyes of the estate tax, which would collect duty on $199,464 of their assets. Over time, such as 50 years, inflation would matter much more. A house valued at $300,000 in 1950 would be the equivalent of $2,143,568 in the year 2000.

The answer to this problem would be to create an adjusted exclusion value, which would rise or fall with core inflation. Of course, the real question is, should the estate tax be repealed once and for all? In a report by the Congressional Budget Office, in fiscal 2007, the federal government received $2.5 trillion in tax revenue. Of that, only $26 billion, or 1.04%, was from estate taxes.

President-Elect Barack Obama said he would freeze the estate tax at 2009 levels – $3.5 million exclusion at a 45% top rate. Considering 2007 only brought $26 billion in revenue from the estate tax, and its exclusion was at $2 million, it is safe to estimate that the revenue produced by Obama’s plan would be even less than is created currently. 2009 will be a testament to this theory, and Obama’s proposal.

Though the estate tax only concerns a small portion of the population, usually less than 50,000 individuals annually, it infringes on the fundamentals of capitalism and punishes success. Family owned businesses often have to sell their company due to the death of the owner because they can’t pay the strict estate tax. In addition, it also promotes fraud and other methods of hiding liquidity and asset value.

The estate tax is a rigid regulatory policy and hampers domestic growth and fiscal freedom. Proceeds from it hardly rationalize its existence, and when 2010 rolls around the corner, data will show the justification for a permanent repeal. Until then, it is nothing more than a soft tyranny.

share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Ballistic Missiles, 33 Minutes, And The Response

April 7th, 2009

On Saturday, April 4, 2009, North Korea launched a long-range ballistic missile of the “Taepodong-2″ class which has the potential for reaching the western United States. North Korea claimed it was a launch for a communications satellite, however, imagery showed different.

According to NORAD and US Northern Command, stage 1 of the missile fell into the Sea of Japan and the rest fell into the Pacific Ocean. The second stage of the missile never fully ignited.

Trailer for “33 Minutes”:

The Heritage Foundation has created a full-length, HD documentary on the threat of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) and how effective missile defense is at intercepting these threats… it is titled 33 Minutes.

Why 33 Minutes? Wherever on Earth an ICBM is launched, it would take 33 minutes or less to hit the US. It is a real threat from not only North Korea, but Iran, Syria, China, Russia and so on.

According to a Rasmussen Reports poll conducted before North Korea’s rocket launch, 57 percent of Americans said they support using military force to neutralize North Korea’s capability to launch missiles. Sixty-six percent of Republicans and 52 percent of Democrats said they support military involvement if North Korea moved forward with its military test.

How long will we wait until the new missle age ushers in WWIII or until it’s too late for a response?

share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

I.O.U.S.A. - Understanding The National Debt

March 27th, 2009

One of the subjects I keep having to explain to people is what is the national deficit and why is it important. It is understandable that to sustain a country, you must spend money. You must also earn revenues through taxation to compensate for the money spent on infrastructure, military and other federal projects. The problem is when there is a deficit in the spending and not a surplus. This can cause an overwhelming effect on the economy and for future generations.

To put it into simple terms, check out this 30 minute movie called I.O.U.S.A, which was published in November of 2008:

The CBO posted this chart the other day regarding the future outlook of the budget deficit (using the presidential analysis method, which basically takes into account the president’s proposals, and determines the budget henceforth). It clearly indicates the MASSIVE spending that congress has done in reference to the stimulus package, bailouts and TARP. Additionally, it outlines the longer-term effects of these programs which will without-a-doubt cause trouble for future budgets.

budgetdeficit15-640.png

A lot has changed since 2008 when I.O.U.S.A. was produced. And unfortunately, when debt is talked about, it normally doesn’t include social security, medicare and other publicly held unfunded liabilities.

Around $60 trillion dollars; our “real” national debt… and it grows higher every day.

share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Hope, Change, Yadda Yadda…

March 22nd, 2009

sp-when.pngWell, after a long 15 months in Iraq, I have decided to get back to blogging, and of course, twittering (or would it be tweeting?). There’s a lot of things to talk about and too little time to do so. While we’ve been over there rebuilding the country, it seems like ours has been falling apart back at home through excessive spending, poor policy decisions and reprehensible legislation. The stock market has fell about 50% since October of 2007, levels not seen since 1997. Unemployment rose to 8.1% which wasn’t seen since 1983. And the fear mongering has just begun.

The bulk of this post comes as not-so-new news to the general population, but I’d like to digress for a moment and catch up.

At any rate, I was watching South Park (S13E02) the other night on Comedy Central and something struck me funny. They were talking about how the town was in turmoil; the jobs were drying up and criminals roamed freely. In one of the alleys during the prologue, a picture of Barack Obama’s famous “CHANGE” poster was pinned up… wrote across it was “WHEN?” Good question.

There has been a lot of second-guessing within the administration to enact certain policies and regulations. When the trillion dollar stimulus package was being created, there was an American-only clause added which would limit the purchase and contracting of resources for the stimulus-related projects from American companies only. The EU caught wind of this amendment and threatened trade embargoes if this were to pass. Of course, Democrats decided to back off and the amendment was terminated. Protectionism has never worked in a world-trade environment; look what happened with Smoot-Hawley.

oscore.pngAnyway, that brings me to my next thought. Firstly, I didn’t and don’t like Obama’s promises during the campaign; he is one of the most, if not the most liberal President yet. His promises are that of Marx and Lenin. He intends to transform America through a soft tyranny. There have already been numerous protests and more are sure to come.

PolitiFact has been keeping track of the promises made and broken by the new President, data which is rather astounding considering how liberal his agenda was in the first place. Namely, one promise which was broken was that each bill that goes before his desk would have five days to be viewed by the public before signing. This kind of broken promise is what caused the latest AIG fallout regarding executive bonuses. Only time will tell us what else happens regarding the “Obameter,” history shows us that disappointments come with the job, though.

Regarding the bailouts and stimulus packages (aka infrastructure and spending packages), don’t get me started. Seriously, when has Keynesian economics every worked, anywhere?

That being said, I’m off… until next time.

share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis